Home On-Air The 8th Day History: October 7, 2016 – Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland...

History: October 7, 2016 – Joint Statement from the Department Of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Election Security


A little reminder of history follows (in a time when facts and history have become very “fluid”).

Why Historically Significant?: Recently,  some a top elected official stated no efforts by previous administration exist to declassify and make public information about interference with U.S. election by Russia prior to November 2016 national election.

Type of Source: Official Government Press Release

Source: DHS Press Office – https://www.dhs.gov/news

Issued jointly by head of U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Authority: The United States Intelligence Community (IC) coordinates and organizes the efforts of 17 organizations focused on U.S. National Security including Program Managers, Departmentals, and Services. This press release originates at the top level of those 17 organizations.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s “role is to organize and coordinate the efforts of the other 16 IC agencies.”

Date of Release: October 7, 2016

URL of source materials (if any): https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national

Press Release Text:

Release Date:
October 7, 2016

DHS and ODNI Seals

For Immediate Release
DHS Press Office
Contact: 202-282-8010

The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.

Some states have also recently seen scanning and probing of their election-related systems, which in most cases originated from servers operated by a Russian company. However, we are not now in a position to attribute this activity to the Russian Government. The USIC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assess that it would be extremely difficult for someone, including a nation-state actor, to alter actual ballot counts or election results by cyber attack or intrusion. This assessment is based on the decentralized nature of our election system in this country and the number of protections state and local election officials have in place. States ensure that voting machines are not connected to the Internet, and there are numerous checks and balances as well as extensive oversight at multiple levels built into our election process.

Nevertheless, DHS continues to urge state and local election officials to be vigilant and seek cybersecurity assistance from DHS. A number of states have already done so. DHS is providing several services to state and local election officials to assist in their cybersecurity. These services include cyber “hygiene” scans of Internet-facing systems, risk and vulnerability assessments, information sharing about cyber incidents, and best practices for securing voter registration databases and addressing potential cyber threats. DHS has convened an Election Infrastructure Cybersecurity Working Group with experts across all levels of government to raise awareness of cybersecurity risks potentially affecting election infrastructure and the elections process. Secretary Johnson and DHS officials are working directly with the National Association of Secretaries of State to offer assistance, share information, and provide additional resources to state and local officials.

———————————————— end of release text ———————————————–

Followup details released January 6, 2017 (PDF)Background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”: The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution  – ICA_2017_01 – Followup on Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections – Source: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf